The Conspiracies Sourcebook - Ebook download as PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read book online. Own conspiratorial groups and cults.CONSPIRACY X • THE CONSPIRACIES SOURCEBOOK Disclaimer The world of Conspiracy X is based on historic and contemporary events. And it is used for general explanations. Also available as a PDF from: DriveThru. ONLINE SUPPORT. THE PARANORMAL SOURCEBOOK. Terrors lurk in the darkness, subvert the souls, and corrupt the mind. Secret detachments of psychics remotely view our every move. Powerful occultists perform secret rituals in hidden locations, manipulating our world to.

And in NASA's training of the Moon and lander module. Conspiracy theorists say that the films of the missions were made using sets similar to this training mockup.

Moon landing claim that some or all elements of the and the associated were staged by, possibly with the aid of other organizations. The most notable claim is that the were faked and that did not actually walk on the. Various groups and individuals have made claims since the mid-1970s, that NASA and others knowingly misled the public into believing the landings happened, by manufacturing, tampering with, or destroying evidence including photos, tapes, radio and TV transmissions, samples, and even some key witnesses. Much exists, and detailed rebuttals to the hoax claims have been made. Since the late 2000s, high-definition photos taken by the (LRO) of the Apollo landing sites have captured the lander modules and the tracks left by the astronauts. Cfa Level 1 Books Free Download 2013.

In 2012, images were released showing five of the six Apollo missions' still standing; the exception is that of, which has lain on the lunar surface since being accidentally blown over by the takeoff rocket's exhaust. Conspiracists have managed to sustain public interest in their theories for more than 40 years, despite the rebuttals and third-party evidence. Opinion polls taken in various locations have shown that between 6% and 20% of Americans, 25% of Britons, and 28% of Russians surveyed believe that the manned landings were faked. Even as late as 2001, the documentary Conspiracy Theory: Did We Land on the Moon? Claimed NASA faked the first landing in 1969 to win the. Main article: Moon-landing conspiracists focus heavily on NASA photos. They point to oddities in photos and films taken on the Moon.

Photography experts (including those unrelated to NASA) answer that the oddities are what one would expect from a real Moon landing, and not what would happen with tweaked or studio imagery. Some of the main arguments and counter-arguments are listed below. In some photos, seem to be behind objects. The cameras were fitted with a (a clear glass plate with crosshairs etched on), making it impossible for any photographed object to appear 'in front' of the grid. This suggests that objects have been 'pasted' over them. • This only appears in copied and scanned photos, not the originals.

It is caused by overexposure: the bright white areas of the emulsion 'bleed' over the thin black crosshairs. The crosshairs are only about 0.004 inches thick (0.1 mm) and emulsion would only have to bleed about half that much to fully obscure it. Furthermore, there are many photos where the middle of the crosshair is 'washed-out' but the rest is intact. In some photos of the American flag, parts of one crosshair appear on the red stripes, but parts of the same crosshair are faded or invisible on the white stripes.